 |
List by fairness category |
|
 |
List by date |
|
|
| |
|
Case Summary : Decision-Making Process
Young worker with a permanent impairment
A young worker contacted the Commission with concerns about the
WSIB’s lack of communication and the decision-making process
in his claim. The worker suffered a partial amputation of his middle
finger while he was using a saw at work. It took six weeks for the
worker’s loss-of-earnings (LOE) benefits to be processed,
and he was never contacted in person by his adjudicator. The worker
felt he was being forced to return to work that was not suitable
and that his adjudicator was not listening to his concerns. By the
time he called the Commission, the worker had developed an infection
at the wound site but was unable to reach anyone at the WSIB to
inquire about further benefits.
Because of the seriousness of the worker’s injury and his
young age, the Commission contacted the assistant director. The
following then happened:
- The nurse case manager became involved and arranged for a priority
referral to the WSIB’s hand clinic. The clinic confirmed
the worker had return-to-work (RTW) restrictions and recommended
physiotherapy and a functional restoration program.
- The worker received LOE benefits for the recurrence of his
injury.
- The WSIB obtained all outstanding medical evidence.
- Once the worker completed his rehabilitation program, an RTW
specialist visited the worksite to help the employer and worker
find suitable modified work.
- The worker returned to modified work.
The worker said to the Commission, “I finally feel like someone
cares.”
(December 2008)
|