 |
List by fairness category |
|
 |
List by date |
|
|
| |
|
Case Summary : Decision-Making Process
Evidence overlooked
The worker brought a complaint to the Commission about her travel
expenses. She was concerned that her claims adjudicator overlooked
medical information from her doctor supporting an increase in her
travel expense eligibility. The Commission contacted the claims
adjudicator who stated that she had not seen the medical information.
In reviewing the worker's claim file, the Commission discovered
the medical information was attached to a health care travel expense
form along with other receipts. When the Commission reported this
finding to the claims adjudicator, she immediately reviewed it to
determine the impact on prior decisions about travel expenses.
After further investigation, the Commission learned that all expense
forms are sent directly to the health care payment processing area,
unless it is for an exceptional expense. The Commission felt that
what happened in this case, however, suggested that information
could be overlooked in the expense payment process. The Commission
advised the Director of Administrative Services of this concern
and he undertook to remind processing staff to carefully review
all expense form attachments to ensure that medical or other important
information that might be attached to the receipts is forwarded
to the claims adjudicators.
(2005)
|